Sennheiser HD 600 Headphones Review

Tested using Methodology v2.0
Review updated Apr 03, 2024 at 04:41 pm
Latest change: Writing modified Apr 25, 2025 at 11:14 am
Sennheiser HD 600 Picture
6.0
Sports And Fitness
4.8
Travel
3.3
Office Work
4.3
Wireless Gaming (In Development)
6.3
Wired Gaming (In Development)
8.0
Audio Reproduction Accuracy
1.8
Noise Isolation
0
Microphone (In Development)
8.6
Frequency Response Consistency

The Sennheiser HD 600 are open-back, over-ear headphones for audiophiles or those who need an analytical listening tool. Originally released in 1997, they underwent a minor cosmetic facelift in 2019. Online reports indicate that there have been no changes to their tried-and-tested sound profile, which promises to deliver high-fidelity sound via their dynamic drivers. Their high impedance and sensitivity mean you'll need a dedicated amp or sound card to get the best out of them, as they won't get loud enough when connected to mobile devices.

Our Verdict

6.0 Sports And Fitness

The Sennheiser HD 600 aren't designed for sports or fitness use. Although they're well-built and have a decently stable fit, they're also big, bulky, and cumbersome. They also lack dedicated controls, and their wired design means you can easily get the cable snagged while in motion.

Pros
  • Stable and comfortable design.
Cons
  • Weak headband build quality.
4.8 Travel

The Sennheiser HD 600 aren't designed for commuting. The open-back ear cups don't isolate you from any ambient noise and leak a lot of audio to the point where they might disturb other commuters. Also, they aren't very portable and don't have a control scheme for mobile devices.

Pros
  • Stable and comfortable design.
Cons
  • Open-back design, so they leak a lot.
  • Poor noise isolation, by design.
3.3 Office Work

The Sennheiser HD 600 aren't made for office use, despite being decently comfortable. Their open-back design leaks a lot of audio that will bother others around you and provides very little attenuation against ambient noise. So, if you're trying to focus on tasks, you'll be easily distracted by office chit-chat around you.

Pros
  • Stable and comfortable design.
Cons
  • Open-back design, so they leak a lot.
  • Poor noise isolation, by design.
4.3 Wireless Gaming (In Development)

The Sennheiser HD 600 are wired headphones and aren't suitable for wireless gaming.

6.3 Wired Gaming (In Development)

The Sennheiser HD 600 are acceptable for gaming. They're decently comfortable, have a flat sound profile, and have a low-latency wired connection. However, they don't have a microphone for voice chat when gaming, so you'll need to purchase a standalone mic. Their underemphasized bass response will also mean that dynamic sound effects, like explosions, will lack some rumble and oomph.

Pros
  • Detailed audio reproduction.
  • Stable and comfortable design.
Cons
  • Open-back design, so they leak a lot.
  • Weak headband build quality.
8.0 Audio Reproduction Accuracy

The Sennheiser HD 600 are great for audio reproduction and accuracy. Their flat sound profile is well-aligned with our target curve, with the exception of the bass range, which is rolled off. Their frequency response doesn't deviate too much from their sound profile though, with only small peaks and dips in the treble range. Their L/R drivers are well-matched when it comes to frequency, amplitude, and phase too, which is indicative of tight tolerances between the drivers.

1.8 Noise Isolation

The Sennheiser HD 600 have a terrible noise isolation performance, though this is by design, due to their open-back design. They provide almost no isolation against bass and mid-range sounds, like honking cars on the street, and only partially attenuate treble range sounds, like office chit-chat. They also leak a lot of audio and aren't suitable for listening in quiet environments.

0 Microphone (In Development)

The Sennheiser HD 600 don't have a built-in microphone.

8.6 Frequency Response Consistency

The Sennheiser HD 600 have excellent frequency response consistency. Most people will experience audio delivery that matches our frequency response measurements, regardless of physical characteristics like head size and hair thickness.

  • 6.0 Sports And Fitness
  • 4.8 Travel
  • 3.3 Office Work
  • 4.3 Wireless Gaming (In Development)
  • 6.3 Wired Gaming (In Development)

Performance Usages

  • 8.0 Audio Reproduction Accuracy
  • 1.8 Noise Isolation
  • 0 Microphone (In Development)
  • 8.6 Frequency Response Consistency

Changelog

  1. Updated Apr 25, 2025:

    This review has been updated to Test Bench 2.0, which adds the following tests: Stereo Mismatch, Group Delay, Cumulative Spectral Decay, PRTF, Harmonic Distortion, and Electrical Aspects. We've added new performance usages and updated the text throughout the Sound tests and side-by-sides.

  2. Updated Apr 25, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 2.0, which updates our sound tests and adds performance usages. You can read more about this in our changelog.
  3. Updated Sep 12, 2024: Several Sound tests have been updated following TB 1.8. There have also been text changes made throughout the review, including to the product comparisons to match these results.
  4. Updated Sep 12, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.8, which updates our target curve and Sound tests. You can read more about this in our changelog.
  5. Updated Jul 24, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.7, which updates our Noise Isolation test. We've also expanded the scope of this test to include Common Scenarios in addition to Voice Handling and Wind Handling.
  6. Updated Jul 23, 2024: The Noise Isolation section has been updated to mention the Sennheiser HD 620S.
  7. Updated Apr 03, 2024: We've updated this review to ensure it remains up-to-date and accurate and have added relevant side-by-side comparisons.
  8. Updated Jan 26, 2024: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.6 , which updates how we measure latency. We've updated and renamed the following test groups: Wired Connection, Bluetooth Connection, and Wireless Connection (Dongle). We've also added new codec latency measurements and provided an audio sample of recorded latency.
  9. Updated Jan 23, 2023: Added a comparison between the Sennheiser HD 600 and the Audio-Technica ATH-R70x in the Compared To Others box.
  10. Updated Jun 29, 2021: Converted to Test Bench 1.5.
  11. Updated Feb 13, 2020: Converted to Test Bench 1.4.
  12. Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.1.
  13. Updated Nov 21, 2019: Converted to Test Bench 1.3.
  14. Updated Aug 12, 2019: We've updated the Comfort score to better reflect how tight these headphones are.
  15. Updated Feb 16, 2018: Converted to Test Bench 1.2.
  16. Updated Aug 10, 2017: Converted to Test Bench 1.1.
  17. Updated Mar 01, 2017: Converted to Test Bench 1.0.
  18. Updated Jun 13, 2016: Review published.
  19. Updated Jun 11, 2016: Our testers have started testing this product.
  20. Updated May 20, 2016: We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.

Differences Between Sizes And Variants

The Sennheiser HD 600 come in one variant: 'Black.' Our unit features a marbled pattern on the headband and ear cups, which has since been discontinued and replaced with a monochrome black finish.

If you encounter another variant of these headphones, please let us know in the comments, and we'll update our review.

Compared To Other Headphones

The Sennheiser HD 600 are over-ear, open-back headphones for dedicated listening setups. They have a flat sound that represents instruments and vocals accurately. However, those who like to hear some oomph in the low-end will find they're lacking in bass. They're also quite comfortable, but a little tight if you have a larger head. If you're looking for open-back headphones with more bass and a more immersive sound, check out the Audio-Technica ATH-R70x. The Sennheiser's build quality also feels somewhat cheap for their price range, especially compared to other premium open-back headphones like the Audeze MM-100. However, they're a great choice if you love to listen to more instruments and vocal-heavy genres.

See also our recommendations for the best headphones for recording, the best headphones for music, and the best over-ear headphones.

Sennheiser HD 650

There's not much to split the Sennheiser HD 650 and the Sennheiser HD 600. They feature very similar sound profiles that lack low-bass delivery with a somewhat recessed treble range. Both feature accurate, detailed mid-range reproduction though. The biggest difference between the two models is that the HD 650 are a bit more comfortable, so you can wear them for longer than the HD 600. Given the similarities in sound profile, budget-conscious audiophiles might want to opt for the more wallet-friendly HD 600.

Sennheiser HD 598

The Sennheiser HD 598 are slightly better headphones than the Sennheiser HD 600, mostly due to comfort. The HD 598 have a better over-ear fit that does not clamp your head and feels very comfortable. They also have a slightly more elevated high-bass which some may like since it adds a bit more punchiness than the HD 600, and they come with an additional cable in the box. On the other hand, the HD 600 deliver audio more consistently and won't sound as boomy on some tracks as the HD 598. The HD 600 also have a slightly better build quality which can be advantageous if you plan on using them frequently.

Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO

The Sennheiser HD 600 and the Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO can both be considered audiophile options but have very different strengths. The Sennheiser have an open-back design. Their passive soundstage is much more open and spacious-seeming, and they have more consistent bass and treble delivery, but their sound lacks a bit of low bass. On the other hand, the Beyerdynamic are closed-back headphones with a more prominent bass range. They have a much more comfortable fit, isolate you from more ambient sound, and leak less audio. As a result, the Sennheiser are a better fit for analytical listening applications, like sound mixing or editing. The Beyerdynamic are great if you value some passive noise isolation and want a bit more rumble in the low end.

HiFiMan Sundara 2020

Between the HiFiMan Sundara 2020 and the Sennheiser HD 600, your best pick depends on your needs and preferences. The HiFiMan are more comfortable and don't need an amp to drive them. While their sound profile lacks bass, they still deliver more thump and rumble than the Sennheiser. On the other hand, the Sennheiser have a flatter mid-range and brighter treble while trapping much less heat against your ears. They're also much more stable and should stay in place while you headbang to your favorite tunes.

Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO

The Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO are better critical listening headphones than the Sennheiser HD 600. The Beyerdynamic offer a better value thanks to their excellent build quality and balanced sound profile. They feel a lot more durable than the Sennheiser and have better bass extension. While the two have similarly detailed mid-range responses, the Sennhesier don't sound as sharp as the Beyerdynamic on bright tracks. They also come with detachable cables.

Sennheiser HD 599

The Sennheiser HD 600 and Sennheiser HD 599 are very similar headphones in performance, and the HD 599 may offer better overall value for most users. Their sound profiles are fairly similar, but the HD 599 are noticeably more comfortable, deliver audio more consistently and don't feel as tight as the HD 600. On the other hand, they don't feel as well-built as the HD 600 and have a less stable fit on the head.

Audio-Technica ATH-R70x

The Audio-Technica ATH-R70x and the Sennheiser HD 600 are very similar-performing audiophile headphones. While the Audio-Technica have a lower bass extension, the Sennheiser have more accurate treble delivery and a more neutral frequency response. However, they have a higher clamping force than the Audio-Technica, making them less comfortable to wear for long listening sessions. Their passive soundstage also isn't as wide and natural-feeling as the Audio-Technica.

Audio-Technica ATH-M50x

Choosing between the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x and the Sennheiser HD 600 essentially comes down to whether you prefer an open- or closed-back design. The Audio-Technica have a more prominent bass reproduction that fans of electronic genres, like techno, will prefer. They can also be used in quieter environments where leaked audio is easily heard and will provide a degree of passive isolation against background noise. On the other hand, the Sennheiser better pinner interaction, which is indicative of a spacious and immersive soundstage. They also offer a more stable fit.

Philips SHP9500

The Sennheiser HD 600 and the Philips SHP9500 are both great open-back audiophile headphones. Their sound profiles are very similar; they both have a very balanced sound, particularly in the mids, although the Philips have a more open sound. They're also more comfortable for long listening sessions, thanks to their spacious ear cups, but they don't feel as well-made as the Sennheiser. The Sennheiser sound more balanced in the treble region, which is less fatiguing for long listening sessions, and part of their slightly more refined design.

Sennheiser HD 560S

The Sennheiser HD 560S are slightly better for most people than the Sennheiser HD 600. The HD 560S are more comfortable and deliver audio more consistently with a slightly weightier bass response. However, the HD 600 are better built and used in more professional audio settings.

Sennheiser HD 490 PRO

While the Sennheiser HD 600 are audiophile headphones, the Sennheiser HD 490 PRO are slightly more suited to professional use in the studio. The HD 490 PRO are more comfortable, deliver audio more consistently, and can reproduce stronger bass frequencies. They also come with two different sets of earpads that you can switch between depending on the task at hand. That said, the HD 600 have a more balanced mid and treble response that matches our target very well, bringing out more detail in vocals and lead instruments. They're also built more solidly. 

Sennheiser HD 6XX

The Sennheiser HD 600 and the Sennheiser HD 6XX are open-back headphones with similar overall performances, and they're both great for neutral sound. The HD 6XX have a more consistent audio delivery across different listeners. However, the HD 600 are more stable.

Sennheiser HD 660S2

Both the Sennheiser HD 660S2 and the Sennheiser HD600 are audiophile open-back headphones designed for analytical listening, though the HD 660S2 are better for this purpose. They deliver audio more consistently and have a slightly more bass-heavy sound profile, that conveys the punch and boom in kicks and basslines better. That said, the HD600's treble range isn't as veiled, which can be helpful in exposing high-frequency audio artifacts in pro audio work. 

Sennheiser HD 620S

The Sennheiser HD 600 are open-back headphones with a much more open and spacious soundstage than the Sennheiser HD 620S. The HD 600 have a less erratic treble response and more detailed mids, though the bass is more subdued than the HD 620S. Your audio is also reproduced with better consistency on the HD 600. The closed-back HD 620S block out more environmental sounds due to their closed-back design. They're comfortable and well-made but don't deliver audio as consistently, and their sound isn't as immersive. Still, if you want more body in your bass, they provide a thicker-sounding thud.

Sennheiser HD 660 S

The Sennheiser HD 600 and the Sennheiser HD 660 S are similar over-ear, open-back headphones, but the HD 600 are a better choice for audiophiles who prefer a more balanced sound and a wider, more speaker-like soundstage. Their bass- and mid-range responses are comparable, but the HD 600 have a brighter and more present treble, while the HD 660 S' veiled treble range can sound dull. The underemphasized treble of the HD 660 S may be preferable if you find sounds in the higher frequencies particularly piercing or painful, but audiophiles will likely find the HD 600 sound more balanced.

AKG K702

The Sennheiser HD 600 and the AKG K702 are both open-back, over-ear headphones that are similarly suited for critical listening. While the Sennheiser reproduce slightly less low-bass than the AKG, they have a less bright treble range that can be less fatiguing over long listening sessions, plus they're more stable on the head. At the same time, the AKG are more comfortable and have a wider soundstage that's perceived as coming from in front rather than from inside the listener's head.

Sennheiser HD 58X Jubilee

The Sennheiser HD 58X Jubilee are very similar to the Sennheiser HD 600. If you don't find them too tight, you'll enjoy the additional punch and boom in the HD 58X's bass range. The HD 58X also have lower retail price, which will appeal to audiophiles looking for a wallet-friendly pair of over-ears.

Audeze LCD-1

The Audeze LCD-1 are slightly better open-back headphones for neutral sound listening than the Sennheiser HD 600. The Audeze have a much sleeker and more premium-looking design, are more comfortable, and have more consistent audio delivery between different users. On the other hand, the Sennheiser are much more stable-feeling on the head.

Meze Empyrean

The Sennheiser HD 600 represent better value for audiophiles than the Meze Empyrean, given they offer a similar sound at a comparatively very modest price. While both headphones struggle to reproduce a thumpy low-bass, the Meze features a recessed treble range that can cause sibilants to sound flat and lifeless. By contrast, the Sennheiser have a more prominent treble response that can be useful in catching imperfections in audio. They also feature a more stable fit. However, if you're an audiophile who prioritizes a more high-end design, the Meze are significantly more comfortable and better built. They also come with a sleek and very sturdy hard case. Their higher PRTF score indicates that their sound has a wider spatial quality too. 

Beats Solo Pro

The Sennheiser HD 600 and the Beats Solo Pro have different strengths, and you may prefer one over the other. The Sennheiser over-ears are designed for audiophiles. They're more comfortable, have a neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer, and have a wider, more immersive passive soundstage. However, the Beats are wireless on-ears that are better built and have great noise isolation, thanks to their ANC system. They also have an H1 chip, so you can seamlessly pair them with Apple devices.

Test Results

perceptual testing image
Sound
Sound
Sound Profile
Normalization Frequency
900 Hz
Bass Amount
Underemphasized (-5 dB)
Treble Amount
Balanced (0 dB)
Sound Signature
Flat

These headphones have a generally flat sound profile that's well-suited for professional sound work and audiophile listening. While they more closely match the SoundGuys.com Studio Curve than our own target, the Sennheiser still lacks in the low-end, which can be underwhelming for some.

8.6
Sound
Frequency Response Consistency
Avg. Std. Deviation
0.63 dB

Their frequency response consistency is excellent. Due to their open-back and ear pad design, these headphones have a very consistent bass delivery across multiple users and re-seats. There's a little more deviation in the treble delivery, but if you take the time to find a solid fit, you'll be rewarded with consistent audio delivery. 

Sound
Raw Frequency Response
6.1
Sound
Bass Profile: Target Compliance
RMS Deviation From Target
7.8 dB
Low-Frequency Extension
61.69 Hz
Low Bass
-11.15 dB
Mid Bass
-3.33 dB
High Bass
0.57 dB

Their bass-range compliance is passable. As with many open-back headphones, they have a somewhat underemphasized bass response that deviates from our target in the low- and mid-bass. This takes some of the boom and slam out of 808s and basslines, which can make listening to genres like techno and house less exciting. That said, there's a touch of warmth in the high bass, as this range isn't as underemphasized as the rest.

9.7
Sound
Mid-Range Profile: Target Compliance
RMS Deviation From Target
0.62 dB
Low Mid
0.57 dB
Mid-Mid
-0.03 dB
High Mid
0.83 dB

The mid-range compliance is outstanding. The response throughout the range is very even and flat and follows our target extremely well. This allows for vocals and lead instruments to be reproduced crisply and with a lot of detail. There's very little deviation in this range from our target curve, so they're an excellent reference point for accurately analyzing mid-range instruments. In songs like Pharoah Sanders' Love Will Find a Way, the alternating saxophone, guitar, and keyboard solos all sound well-defined, with accurately reproduced timbres.

9.4
Sound
Treble Profile: Target Compliance
RMS Deviation From Target
2.09 dB
Low Treble
-0.23 dB
Mid Treble
-1.85 dB
High Treble
-4.26 dB

These open-backs have incredible treble compliance. Their response is generally well-balanced across the entire range. There's a slight bump in the low treble that adds presence to the upper harmonics of vocals and lead instruments. There's also a slight dip in the mid-treble that ensures sibilants don't sound too harsh.

7.9
Sound
Peaks/Dips
Peaks
1.15 dB
Dips
1.64 dB

The peaks and dips performance is very good, meaning that their frequency response generally follows their flat sound signature. Most of the deviations occur in the treble range, with a peak in the low-treble that helps bring out the upper harmonics of vocals, followed by a dip and a peak in the mid-treble. The result is that sibilants alternate between sounding slightly dull and bright depending on their pitch.

8.4
Sound
Stereo Mismatch
Weighted Amplitude Mismatch
0.3 dB
Weighted Frequency Response Mismatch
0.7 dB
Weighted Phase Mismatch
0.9°

The Sennheiser HD 600 have a great stereo mismatch performance. There's hardly any mismatch between the L/R drivers when it comes to amplitude and frequency, which indicates good quality control and tight tolerances between the drivers. Similarly, with phase, mismatches are negligible and limited to the upper range of human hearing, so they likely won't affect everyday audio playback.

6.9
Sound
Group Delay
Weighted Group Delay
1.2 ms

Their group delay performance is okay. Group delay falls most below the audibility threshold across the entire frequency range, except the low-bass, resulting in transparent treble and mid-range reproduction. While there are some spikes in the low-bass, this is a range that these headphones struggle to reproduce anyway, so the elevated group delay isn't particularly audible. 

Sound
Cumulative Spectral Decay
5.6
Sound
PRTF
PRTF Accuracy (RMS Deviation)
2.91 dB
PRTF Size (Avg.)
2.43 dB
PRTF Distance
9.21 dB

They have a middling PRTF performance. While their open-back design allows for a good amount of audio interaction with the outer ear, creating the impression of width, the soundstage still sounds closed-off and lacks an immersive quality. While these open-back headphones may feel more open and spacious sounding than closed-back headphones like the Drop + THX Panda Wireless, they still fall short of the spatial qualities created by angled reference speakers. 

9.3
Sound
Harmonic Distortion
WHD @ 94 dB SPL
0.05%
WHD @ 104 dB SPL
0.15%

The Sennheiser HD 600 have an incredible harmonic distortion performance. Even at elevated listening levels, there's very little degradation of audio fidelity, and certainly no coloration that will be audible in everyday listening. 

Sound
Electrical Aspects
Sensitivity @1kHz-1V
105.1 dB SPL
Bluetooth Max SPL
N/A

You'll need a dedicated amp to drive these headphones if you plan on using them with mobile end devices, like smartphones and laptops. 

0
Sound
Virtual Soundstage
Head Modeling
No
Speaker Modeling
No
Room Ambience
No
Head Tracking
No
Virtual Surround
No App
Sound
Test Settings
Firmware
No Firmware
Power
Passive
Connection
Wired
Codec
PCM, 24-bit, 48kHz
Test Instrument Audio Precision APx517B
EQ
No EQ
ANC
No ANC
Tip/Pad
Default
Microphone
No Microphone

These are the settings we used to test these headphones. Our results are only valid in this configuration.

Design
Design
Style
Type Over-ear
Enclosure Open-Back
Wireless No
Transducer Dynamic

The Sennheiser HD 600 look very similar to the Sennheiser HD 650, with a few differences in the headband design. These headphones have large open ear cups with a suede-like finish on the padding that gives them a premium appeal. Their cool blue patterned finish makes them stand out from the other models in the Sennheiser HD series. However, newer units are only available in a monochrome black finish.

7.0
Design
Comfort
Weight 0.57 lbs
Clamping Force
1.4 lbs

These headphones are comfortable but a little tight. They have large ear cups that easily fit around most listeners' ears. They're well-padded and covered in a suede-like material that adds to their comfort level. Unfortunately, the headband exerts a little too much pressure on the head compared to the Sennheiser HD 650 and the Sennheiser HD 598, which can get uncomfortable during long listening sessions. If you want a more comfortable pair of audiophile headphones, look at the HiFiMan Sundara 2020.

0
Design
Controls
OS Compatibility
No Controls
Ease Of Use No Controls
Feedback No Controls
Call/Music Control No
Volume Control No
Microphone Control No
Channel Mixing
No
Noise Cancelling Control No
Talk-Through
No
Additional Controls No

These headphones don't have a control scheme or an audio cable with an in-line remote.

5.4
Design
Portability
L 7.7" (19.5 cm)
W 6.9" (17.5 cm)
H 3.9" (10.0 cm)
Volume 208.16 in³ (3,411.12 cm³)
Transmitter Required No

They're big, bulky headphones that don't fold into a more compact design for transport. They're not made to be carried around often, and they don't come with a case to easily store them in your bag, which makes them less portable. The box they come in can be used as a substitute for a case. Unfortunately, it's far too large and cumbersome for mobile use.

0
Design
Case
Type No case
L N/A
W N/A
H N/A
Volume N/A
7.5
Design
Build Quality

They have a good, solid build quality. The open ear cups feel dense enough not to crack or get damaged by a few falls. However, the headband feels fragile. Also, the metal frame that links the ear cups to the headband is connected by a thin joint that looks weak and feels susceptible to breaking under moderate physical stress.

7.5
Design
Stability

These headphones aren't designed for sports. However, they deliver a tight, stable fit that will remain in place during casual listening sessions and more intense headbanging. They aren't ideal for the gym due to their bulky design, but they offer a tight enough fit to be stable in most situations. Unfortunately, the detachable cord won't disconnect before yanking the headphones off your head if hooked on something.

Design
Headshots 1
Design
Headshots 2
Design
Top
Design
In The Box

  • Sennheiser HD 600 headphones
  • 1/8" to 1/4" adapter
  • Audio cable
  • Manual

Isolation
1.9
Isolation
Noise Isolation - Full Range
Noise Cancelling No
Overall Attenuation
-4.34 dB
Bass
0.09 dB
Mid
1.05 dB
Treble
-15.64 dB

These headphones have poor isolation due to their open-back design. In the bass range, where the rumble of airplane and bus engines sit, they offer no attenuation. They do a similarly poor job blocking out mid-range noise, like background conversations. They offer a small amount of attenuation against treble range noise, though, so they'll diminish the perceived volume of sounds like computer fan whine. Still, if you need better isolation, closed-back headphones like the Sennheiser HD 620S provide more of a buffer between you and your environment.

1.7
Isolation
Noise Isolation - Common Scenarios
Airplane Noise Attenuation
-3.06 dB
Airplane Noise Isolation Audio
Office Noise Attenuation
-3.15 dB
Office Noise Isolation Audio
Street Noise Attenuation
-3.11 dB
Street Noise Isolation Audio
Isolation
Noise Isolation - Voice Handling
Female Voice 1
Male Voice 1
Female Voice 2
Male Voice 2
Isolation
ANC Wind Handling
ANC Wind Noise
N/A
1.6
Isolation
Leakage
Leakage Audio
Overall Leakage @ 1ft
63.75 dB

The Sennheiser HD 600's leakage is poor, although this is to be expected given their open-back design. Leakage is loud and concentrated in the upper-mid and treble ranges, so escaping audio sounds thin. Even at regular listening volumes, your audio will be detectable by others around you, especially if you work in a quieter environment, like a co-working space.

Microphone
Microphone
Microphone Style
Integrated
No
In-Line
No
Boom
No
Detachable Boom
No
Mic No
0
Microphone
Recording Quality
Recorded Speech
N/A
LFE
N/A
FR Std. Dev.
N/A
HFE
N/A
Weighted THD
N/A
Gain
N/A
0
Microphone
Noise Handling
SpNR
N/A
Noise Gate
No
Speech + Pink Noise Handling
N/A
Speech + Pink Noise Audio Sample N/A
Speech + Subway Noise Handling
N/A
Speech + Subway Noise Audio Sample N/A
Active Features
0
Active Features
Battery
Battery Type
No Battery
Continuous Battery Life
N/A
Additional Charges
N/A
Total Battery Life
N/A
Charge Time
N/A
Power-Saving Feature
No
Audio While Charging
No
Passive Playback
Passive Headphone
Charging Port None
0
Active Features
App Support
App Name No App
iOS No
Android No
macOS No
Windows No
Equalizer
No
ANC Control
No
Mic Control No
Room Effects
No
Playback Control
No
Button Mapping No
Surround Support
No
Connectivity
9.9
Connectivity
Wired Connection
Analog Audio
Yes
USB Audio
No
Detachable
Yes
Length
9.84 ft (3.00 m)
Connector
1/8" TRS
Latency - Analog
0.2 ms
Latency - USB
N/A
Recorded Latency
Recorded Latency Connection Analog

These headphones have a simple 1/8" TRS audio cable with no in-line remote/microphone, so they'll only provide audio when connected to your PC, PlayStation, and Xbox consoles. Latency via analog is very low, so you won't experience any sync issues between audio and video if you use them to watch video content.

0
Connectivity
Bluetooth Connection
Bluetooth Version
No Bluetooth
Multi-Device Pairing
No
Quick Pair (Android)
No
Quick Pair (iOS)
No
Line Of Sight Range
N/A
Latency - SBC
N/A
Latency - aptX
N/A
Latency - aptX Adaptive (High Quality)
N/A
Latency - aptX Adaptive (Low Latency)
N/A
Latency - LDAC
N/A
Recorded Latency
N/A
Recorded Latency Codec No Bluetooth Audio
AAC Support
No
0
Connectivity
Wireless Connection (Dongle)
Line Of Sight Range
N/A
Latency - Dongle
N/A
Recorded Latency
N/A
Connectivity
PC Compatibility
Analog
Audio Only
Wired USB
No
Non-BT Wireless
No

These headphones can be connected to PCs using their analog connection. You can use them to receive audio, but you'll need to purchase a separate microphone if you want to input audio.

Connectivity
PlayStation Compatibility
PS4 Analog
Audio Only
PS4 Wired USB
No
PS4 Non-BT Wireless
No
PS5 Analog
Audio Only
PS5 Wired USB
No
PS5 Non-BT Wireless
No

These headphones can be connected to PlayStation consoles via the AUX port of your controller. You can use them to receive audio, but you'll need to purchase a separate microphone if you want to communicate with teammates.

Connectivity
Xbox Compatibility
Xbox One Analog
Audio Only
Xbox One Wired USB
No
Xbox One Non-BT Wireless
No
Xbox Series X|S Analog
Audio Only
Xbox Series X|S Wired USB
No
Xbox Series X|S Non-BT Wireless
No

These headphones can be connected to Xbox family consoles via the AUX port of your controller. You can use them to hear game audio, but you'll need to purchase a standalone microphone to communicate with teammates.

0
Connectivity
Base/Dock
Type
No Base/Dock
USB Input
No
Line In
No
Line Out
No
Optical Input
No
RCA Input
No
Dock Charging
No
Power Supply
No Base/Dock